For one week, every piece of AI work your squad uses gets a named person who checked it. What changes?
What
For one week, agree as a squad that anything AI helped make, whether a summary, a draft, code or copy, has a named person who checked it before it's used.
Why
“I thought you were checking that” is one of the easiest ways for AI mistakes to slip through. Naming a checker is simple, but it changes how people work. This experiment tests whether it's worth making a habit. It comes from The AI Squad Playbook.
How
1At your next stand-up, agree the rule: AI can do the work, but a named person always checks it.
2Keep a simple log: what AI helped with, who checked it, and whether they changed anything.
3At the end of the week, look at the log together. How often did the checker catch something?
4Decide whether to keep the rule, change it or drop it.
Decide who checks what
Use the free interactive AI Squad Playbook to agree who checks AI's work across your squad.
Open the playbookWhat to watch for
- ○How often did checking change the work?
- ○Did it slow the squad down, and was that worth it?
- ○Did anyone feel the checking was unfair or unclear?
Tried it?
Did your squad keep the rule?
Tell us what happened, good or bad. Other members are trying it too.
Discuss in our LinkedIn Group